I don't know exactly what sparked it, but for many years now I've had a peculiar fascination with visual design. I find myself scrutinizing (to various degrees) almost every form of graphical layout I come across, be it anything from a magazine or a paper document, billboards, instant scratchie tickets, instruction booklets, even software interfaces and television astons.
This is me being more than just a picky person with too much time on his hands (but that's a completely different issue...). I actually enjoy applying a critical eye to various media, eagerly flipping through 100s of pages of Human Interface Guidelines or spending months designing and perfecting forms based around the convoluted procedures of my previous employer.
My fascination for this stuff is definitely helped by (or possibly originated from) my interests in typography, typesetting and typefaces. I'm happily familiar with ligatures, bouma, ascenders, kerning, tracking and diacritics, happy to know the differences between the em/en/ex trio, and also for being aware that there are 15 'space' characters in the official Unicode spec.
Back in March last year it was announced that Microsoft will be including 7 brand new fonts when they release Windows Vista & Office 2007. Six of these are new 'creative' fonts, although in a twinge of irony they all sound so similiar: Calibri, Cambria, Candara, Consolas, Constantia & Corbel. The seventh typeface to launch with Vista is new font called Segoe ("see-go") which will become the default user interface font in the new versions of Windows and Office.
Considering the last time Microsoft included new fonts in a widespread release we ended up with Tahoma (the current Windows UI font) and its even sexier cousin Verdana, I guess I was looking forward to the new font's release. Verdana is installed on over 90% of machines and used on millions of websites (including Pants :) due to its hinted-for-screen readability. I've also relied on it heavily (along with Frutiger) for most of the designs I've had to do over the years, so I was hoping the fonts (Segoe in particular) would complement my sans-serif A-Team duo.
At the time of the announcement 12 months ago, I made attempts to acquire the Segoe font because Vista was still a long ways off (and it still is). My Google-fu wasn't working too well but every month or so I'd start searching again in the hopes that someone would leak the TTF files onto the net. It happened eventually, but even to this day the only TTF file that escaped the MS compounds and circulated is one particular variant (Segoe UI) of a large family of fonts.
I hadn't bothered to search for the full font set again since December (no, not because I was losing sleep over it - I just forgot about it ;), but last week I was doing some computer spring-cleaning and guess what I found? Buried somewhere on a marketing/promotional DVD that Microsoft sent me was a set of 14 variants (ie. Segoe Regular, Segoe Black, Condensed, Italic, Light, Semibold, etc.). I imagine it's almost the complete family of the Segoe typeface...!
While there's a very strong temptation to chuck all these Segoe TTF files into a zip and offer it for download here on my site, I fear the (potential) wrath of Microsoft's legal team. After installing the fonts to see how Segoe stacked up, I discovered that it is Microsoft who might need to be the ones fearing the wrath of legal action... Take a look:

This comparison shows Microsoft's Segoe versus Frutiger Next, a 'refreshed' version of the original Frutiger font family. See any similarities? It appears as though Segoe is remarkably similar, and 'remarkably similar' could very easily translate to 'a complete rip-off'. There are extremely subtle differences between the two typefaces, but it seriously looks to me like MS are infringing on Linotype's design here.
I've used the semibold and medium faces here as my example, but the other weights of Segoe all match up to the Frutiger Next equivalent. The biggest difference I can notice is that Segoe's character kerning is a bit looser (in the example, Frutiger Next is tracked by +2.4%em so they match up better), but the character outlines themselves share remarkable similarity. Dodgy...
In just one sentence, I suppose I could sum up this whole little story like this:
"I've spent over a year searching for a font I've already been using for years, d'oh...!"
Much like my last update, this site update continues the recent worrying Pants trend of taking an excessive number of paragraphs to convey such a simple message. Normally I'd apologise to my readers for this, but then I remember that I don't have any readers and besides, what else am I going to do with my time? Hey yeah - Clipsal 500 is next week. Woohoo! :)