|The time machine that doubles as a toilet.|
News Archives - October 2004
October 31 2004
: Blame It On The Boogie
If it feels like I've been a bit slow with regards to Pants updates recently, I don't blame you...
Not that I've ever guaranteed that there'll be fresh content all the time, I generally try to fit in a few updates each month to keep the lurkers happy. Some interesting stuff has happened this month for me though, which unfortunately has meant that all I have to offer is a crappy review of two crappy albums.
The majority of the review was actually ready to be published near the end of September (I had planned for the 29th, to be exact), but an entertaining combination of work-, personal- and medical-related mishaps & adventures meant that the update was effectively shelved for most of October. To my credit I did end up publishing it 'close enough' to the end of the month for it to pass as my only real October update, simply scroll down to read my ramblings...
While I'd like to say that the month of November will be more productive, I honestly don't know if October has seen the beginning of a continuing trend. My current plans for upcoming updates to the Pants Network include uploading more of my old artwork & projects to the Pixels section, some other resume/portfolio-type stuff (hint, hint... :), plus I'd really like to begin work on a long-overdue redesign & overhaul of the local chatterbox, forum.pantsnetwork.com. And I've still got those erotic newsletter archives to post up too, mustn't forget them...
It'll always be cool to submit questions for the Pants Q&A page as they are relatively easy updates for me to do, plus I'll always be loitering around the forum filling the board with cynicism & snarky comments. Basically, if there are no new updates here for a while in November, it means I'm either busy working on the site or simply just busy with other stuff.
October 31 2004
: Dirty Underwear
Creating an album that achieves massive popularity & sales figures worldwide is no mean feat, and the challenge is heightened if the artist isn't singing in English all the time...
A challenge was submitted a few months ago for me to review Shakira's 2001 album, Laundry Service. Having won two Latin GRAMMY® awards for her previous work, this is her first English-language album and also features a selection of songs sung in her native Spanish.
Like with any review I do, I needed another album to use as a comparison... While I'd love to use Britney in every album head-to-head, I figured that a fairer comparison would be another artist's "multi-language" album. Fitting the Pants pattern of only reviewing female pop artists who are generally perceived as talentless fluff, I've chosen the 2003 album 200KM/H In The Wrong Lane by Russian duo T.A.T.U. (standing for "Ta lyubit tu", translates to "She loves her").
There's a nice contrast between Shakira & TATU, not just with their music but the way they were marketed by their record labels (Sony & Interscope/Universal respectively). In her 'mainstream debut', Shakira was so close to being carefully positioned as a humble & fragile (albeit worldly) Columbian superstar, just like TATU were just inches away from being known simply as two innocent Russian schoolgirls.
But you have to remember that selling albums is big business, so the image makers needed to step it up a notch. Shakira's minders sought the exotic temptress look, while the TATU girls took the sure-fire approach and did what any fame-seeking artists should do...: "Hey, look! We're lesbians!". Seeing how well Shakira pulled off the saucy foreigner look, it was interesting that no one had dared the lesbian teenager approach before... It undoubtedly worked, with the girls creating a lot of controversy (hence publicity & more sales) over the stunt.
Avoiding the temptation to continue posting lesbian pictures all day, I guess these album reviews should include a few words on the actual music. Quite a strange concept, but I'll give it a go:
And finally, what kind of review would this be without breaking out the Pants Network-exclusive Graphomatic™:
Ultimately both albums are pretty bad when it comes down to it, though I would tend to favour TATU's album for a couple of reasons. Considering the horrible amount of airplay Shakira receives (due in part to her #2 placement in the 2002 ARIA charts), plus her inability to clearly annunciate her English mean that TATU are the clear winners of this head-to-head album review. Besides, they're lesbians, remember...?
Unfortunately, as with anything that has a winner, there must also be a loser in all this. Easily the big loser in this fiasco is the entire music industry, followed closely by the 2 or 3 poor souls who actually read my website. Sorry guys...
I'm now taking suggestions for the next review. :)
There's more where that came from...: Return to the News Archives index.
|:: Pants Network | v0.98||© Copyright 2010 Adam Rachwal ::|